The Jarring Legacy of Harold Bloom!
Today we are going to talk about a man who has been a towering influence upon the literary world as well as academia. Someone who has been called and I quote “a dinosaur”, “Donald Trump of Literary Studies”, “the most notorious literary critic in America”, “the imperious and convivial scholar and literary critic” and at the same time “a singular breed of scholar-teacher-critic-prose-poet-pamphleteer”. Harold Bloom.
Harold Bloom, the 'Sterling Professor of Humanities' at Yale University, who passed away last week, has been a decisive figure and somewhat of a lone-warrior in the field of literary studies. His legacy is considered by many to be troublesome with his unapologetic call to depoliticize literary studies and promote orthodox aesthetic values. For example, when Harry Potter became popular in the early 2000s, it was he who famously dismissed it as a “string of cliches”. Could 35 million people be wrong about their choice? “Yes,” he said, with his signature magisterial infallibility.
So who is Harold Bloom? Why have some of his writings become so controversial? What does he mean by calling critical theories, the School of Resentment?
Harold Bloom, born into a humble Orthodox Jewish family, joined Yale University for his postgraduate studies. He was employed later by Yale University and has continued to work there till last week when he delivered his last lecture.
He has written profusely and has published over 40 books including his most famous The Western Canon and The Anxiety of Influence. The latter text contains one of his most influential idea, “the anxiety of influence” which is that new poets struggle to overcome the influence of older writers with original writings produced through a misreading or misinterpretation of the works of his/her past literary forbears.
Bloom’s further fame and infamy alike lies in his arguments regarding the Western Literary Canon and his idea of an ever-constant, non-subjective yardstick for aesthetic beauty, which can be used to measure the quality of writings and writers. His insistence of keeping literary studies away from all political considerations is perhaps what makes Bloom a peculiar, almost jarring figure amongst contemporary literary circles. Bloom believes that great literature cannot be evaluated within the frameworks of ethnicity, race, gender, etc. Bloom refuses to acknowledge social realities have anything to do with aesthetic pleasure. Hence, works such as that of Alice Walker, Toni Morrison, or Maya Angelou shockingly does not fit into what Bloom sees as the Western Canon.
Harold Bloom, saw himself, as one among the sole champions of ‘aesthetic value’ and ‘literary studies’, as a descendant of the likes of Samuel Johnson. Whether Bloom shall be judged as an anachronistic anomaly or as a lone champion, only time can tell. In the meantime, Bloom’s legacy shall live on albeit alongside Harry Potter, Batman, and Color Purple of course.
References and Recommended Readings
Obituaries and articles on Bloom
https://rewire.news/religion-dispatches/2019/10/16/struggling-with-the-legacy-of-harold-bloom-brilliant-but-deeply-flawed-critic-1930-2019/
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/15/books/harold-bloom-appraisal.html
https://www.newyorker.com/culture/postscript/misreading-harold-bloom
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/14/books/harold-bloom-dead.html
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/long_reads/the-immortal-harold-bloom-the-greatest-literary-critic-on-the-planet-a7681621.html
https://www.truthdig.com/articles/harold-blooms-tragic-confession/
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/oct/16/harold-bloom-against-the-school-of-resentment/
https://observer.com/2018/01/naomi-wolf-harold-bloom-yale-harassment/
Interviews
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9ieF7LVbyI&t=112s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVWiwd0P0c0&t=163s
Bloom on Harry Potter
https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB963270836801555352

Comments
Post a Comment